Games

16796 readers

973 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

247

Steam keeps on winning (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

157 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and the game’s publisher has an exclusivity deal in place and the devs can’t turn around and decide to give their game to another publisher

This is not the exclusivity that I am talking about. Publishers as a rule still publish games through multiple channels. I am talking about exclusivity of the storefront. Not publishers’.

Imagine if all storefronts had only exclusive games. Then they would have nearly zero incentives to have a good storefronts that users like and instead just hunt for the best games. The users would not have a choice which storefront they like - the market is totally broken and not working in this case.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Man... Are you buying games to play them or to spend time looking at the storefront?

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I spend noticeable amount of time choosing games, reading reviews, participating in forums, plus having convenient library is important too. Reading news, plans about games, updates… yes all of that is important to me and how well it is implemented matters.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Reviews, forums, news... All things you shouldn't depend on a storefront to do because the store has an incentive not to be neutral...

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That’s user reviews, game news provided by game making companies. The storefront is a platform where those are posted. Storefront is a place where you search for product and having them in the storefront is very convenient and is something users want. But you are right, they should not be controlled and manipulated by storefront. And they are not in case of STEAM, for example. Storefronts should compete how good they can give this ecosystem to user, not how much games they can lock out from other stores. That, and the cost of games.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

"and they are not in case of Steam"

Let me introduce you to reviews on Steam and their forums!

You're also the one who pointed out that you prefer Steam because it's got them but now it suddenly doesn't? You're hard to follow buddy! Unless you're saying they don't have control over their own forums and the user reviews posted on their storefront???