this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
41 points (87.3% liked)

Games

16806 readers
939 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Laws? Preventing bad things?! Preposterous!

Since when are scams illegal?

I reiterate: Jesus Christ.

You know what, sure, give your kids just a little heroin, to teach them not to do heroin. God luck and good speed.

Meanwhile - for adults - this entire business model is intolerable. You have access to your credit card. Right? You can blow your entire paycheck, not some measly allowance, on fake shit inside a ""free"" game. That's what it's designed to take from you. We don't fucking need it. It's infecting everything. We can just ban it.

If we do not ban it, there will be nothing else. For me, or you, or your smack-addict sprog. The entire video game industry is slowly being ruined by this bullshit, and your fusion-hot take is that we should let it scam children specifically because it's a scam. What the everlasting fuck.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca -1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It's hard to argue with people thinking that giving a kid heroin is equal to let them open a gacha egg or lootbox and how they respond to the results. I don't know how you can make that connection and I'd like to see a reputable peer reviewed study where even expose once or a couple times lootbox and then they become untreatable gambling addicts. Show me anything and I will make personal call to the research institute asking questions and donate them, hosting a website and then spread it like gospel. You can't because that's not how gambling addiction works.

You are forming this "XXX = evil" argument and tag it's like feeding heroin to your kid. But provides nothing or alternative to help parents to catch those traits early. The same take away your entire pay check works for pretty many other things that are currently exists, like option trading, you wanna ban those too?

Lastly, you are also wrong about how the game industry works today. The whale hunters are moving to expensive skins in limited timed pass/event purchases to fomo their whale targets, the lootbox bussiness is shrinking even after the kompu gacha ban in Japan. People can sue and get (maybe not full) their money back, a couple case in Japan, EU, US and even Canada already.(most recent notable is the Epic lootbox/vbuck settlement case.)

The AAAs there are more games that recently come out without "any" mtx except digital deluxe and pre-order bonus, and they make banks compare to those in the F2P space. Which universe you lived in that all games become F2P and you are forced to play those and have to become addict to them? Check both out:

https://store.steampowered.com/sale/BestOf2022

https://store.steampowered.com/sale/BestOf2023

Notice any difference? There are less F2P titles in top platinum 1st~12th in 2023 than 2022, where is your version of F2P doomsday coming from?

And I hope your ban-this ban-that universe is so perfect that no one can scam, everyone is nice law abiding saints that work for free and help everyone in need. No no need to learn financial literacy and responsible spending behavior and you just need to hook this thing up before you sleep and your life will be perfect.

Come on, I am still waiting for your study that shows some miracle level of addiction triggering lootbox mechanics.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Fuck your parenting.

For the last time: adults adults adults. This abuse is bad, for adults. I don't care about your children, at all, full stop.

YOU want this abuse to exist. You KNOW it's abuse. You have fully acknowledged it is a scam, but you LIKE the scam, because it'll teach your miserable spawn a lesson. Fuck that lesson. Fuck your kids. Scams are bad, actually. Fuck abusive business models. Fuck anyone who thinks addiction requires 100.0% of users to get addicted before we can call it deliberate psychological abuse to induce addiction for limitless quantities of actual money.

Why the hell would I need to name an alternative way to teach your kids about the orphan-threshing machine, when I am saying the orphan-threshing machine should not exist?

Why do you think "free" games are the only place this happens, when fucking Diablo has this garbage in it? This is coming to EVERYTHING. There will be nothing else, if we let it continue! It is the dominant strategy! Do you know what those words mean? Do you even care what words mean?

I'm inclined to say no, when you keep sneering as hard as you can about identifying intolerable abuse, as if saying "that's bad and it needs to stop" is a contradiction, unless I solve all problems forever.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

well, look at that simple finger pointing argument tech. As an adult you can do better.

Let me copy something I typed a bit earlier to a different guy that copied almost the same strat you use but less cursing. "Abuse means you are in a position where the victim can’t or don’t know how to say no to your malpractice." Let's see what my kid currently can ask me to stop:

  • humming, whistling, that make noise he caused since his youtube video stuck in my head
  • get one vegetable out of his plate and replace with a different kind he can take.
  • if he had enough tickling quota and asked me to stop any time.
  • right I forgot you don't care about my kid, maybe I should also stop here.

Any person without the addiction trait can just stop, the time it takes to get there varied by which part of distribution you fall on. As gamer we simply do so because:

  • there are newer better ones out there
  • you burned out grinding or simply tired of that price gouging shit throwing at you, you learn to identify those sales pitch and not get involved next time
  • you run out of money? you are in therapy? regain your self control after properly follow instruction to separate out access to available fund by a trusted 3rd party?
  • you simply don't like the game loop, that's what happened to me with MMO boom, I tried a couple and none of them attracted me.

Disclaimer: I probably have really high tolerance because of Monster Hunter, the OG rng drop action rpg where you hunt the same monster for 3 chances of 1% drop per hunt. My understanding of probability and other game mechanics to keep you there really thanks to this game. Where you burn time instead of money.

Gacha game itself is not an abusive practice, we have establish that cause the widely available statistics from many other existing industries(gacha eggs, trading cards, lottery, etc) I've mentioned before. If you don't like the game you simply stop playing. If you liked the game so much and can not stop playing, you might need to seek therapy as you fall under that group in distribution as "highly susceptible". And if you are a addict victim yourself, hating/banning all those that traps people like you does not solve the fundamental issues, including cursing and painting a internet stranger as some type of "enabler" or putting your words in my mouth, I am not going to repeat those.

I did not say it has to be free game for that to happen, but because free game relies on mtx and other mechanics to survive so they must have something else in game to get revenue. Actually, even free games are going away from that practice cause most people learn. Sharing knowledge is a great thing, people break down how much money you need to spend to get something or how many hours you need to grind in Diablo 4 for stuff pretty much less than one month after launch. They helped so many people before they fall into that "grinding pit". Any seasoned player will look for those before they even dip their hands in a game because of sunken cost fallacy, "I need to keep playing cause I invest so much time/money in this game already", instead of focus on "does playing the game is still fun?"

This is not coming to everything, let me show you a couple top selling game in last stretch of 2023(after Sep):

  • Baldur's Gate
  • Starfield
  • Cyberpunk(the DLC update and bundle)
  • Alan Wake II
  • Spiderman II
  • Super Mario Bros. Wonder

The games that receives really well but I don't have sales data:

  • Robocop
  • Lie of P, Lords of fallen (Souls like)
  • The Talos Principle 2
  • Avatar

What about other games that aren't even on my radar? Well, I don't care.

Like I mentioned, you do your thing, push for regulation, do your best and I'd hate to tell you that it doesn't work if you put that energy toward me instead of, say, running for legislation rep. As an adult you should know about this by now, I hope you learn and improve and push for your ideal society. Just like I learn a couple new words from your post even though it's just useless efforts to try get me upset about something baseless.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You are trolling.

This has been pointless.

Go away.

[–] MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago

Lmao a perfect summary of everything you shit out on this site

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)