this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
779 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3434 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Repeat after me: This. present. hype. is. not. A.I. By parroting the marketing bullshit, it doesn't become less false. Large Language Models are just glorified pattern matching and everyone who calls them AI is a dumb fuck.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's called AI even if it isn't artificial intelligence, it's unfortunately how language works. Like how literally has been redefined to mean figuratively.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s called AI even if it isn’t artificial intelligence, it’s unfortunately how language works.

Only for people for whom words don't have meanings. There is nothing "intelligent" about pattern matching. As I said - only dumbfucks call it "A.I." and we shouldn't regurgitate the verbal diarrhea of marketing idiots.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

You can be upset about it, it doesn't change the fact that it IS called AI. Also the meaning of words change constantly.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't make it not a disruptive technology

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

True. But it makes the 30% extra carbon emissions even worse: Ruining our climate for something that isn't even AI. Not that ruining it for anything should be on the table.