this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
452 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

12344 readers
675 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 46 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I keep seeing clips of this one specific robot and it just seems like it's an LLM. The comments on the clips are always people seemingly really believing it's thinking and is alive.

This robot makes me think there is a percentage of the population that believes we already have true general AI and I can see how people like that would think having it do a commencement speech was a good idea.

The university probably got paid for this, right?

[–] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just my small sample size of the people I interact with outside work (no engineers think AI is actually general AI) lots of people think AI is some 2001 Hal level intelligence.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I only know that it is useful. I will let other people decide the philosophy parts.

[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

the university probably got paid

Never underestimate management’s ability to do stupid shit (like paying for this) in the name of “the future”.

They were gonna pay for a speaker anyway.

[–] Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 months ago

if you know how they work llms are obviously not general ai.

but people are really bad at understanding how technology works especially with intangible stuff like computer programs.

scifi has covered ai for years, and now there is software that can mostly convincingly generate sentences.

people that understand both, see the very different approaches.

but people that don't only see the almost convincing results.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That one in particular is actually a relatively old project made to not only talk but look and move, and make facial expressions like a human. It's called Sophia by Hanson robotics. It might've gotten a bit better at chatting with people thanks to LLMs but it is old (they revamp the servos and skin every so often). They use it as a research platform for human robot interaction. It was on Jimmy Fallon's Tonight Show 7 years ago.

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

but the aspect of it that is most AI-like is the chat which is from LLMs.

It may have started 7 years ago, but it isn't a new or different technology than LLMs which are impressive but not actual thinking AI despite them presenting it that way and people interpreting it that way