ramirezmike

joined 1 year ago
[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (34 children)

not if you had one of those setups where you can burn right from a source CD to multiple target blanks

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

It doesn't matter that it was correct. There isn't anything that verifies what it's saying, which is why it's not recommended to ask it questions like that. You're taking a risk if you're counting on the information it gives you.

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

because it could have just as easily confidentiality said something incorrect. You only know it's correct by going through the process of verifying it yourself, which is why it doesn't make sense to ask it anything like this in the first place.

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

I feel like it just paints an absurd situation. They're in a precarious situation and can lose their balance and fall forward or backward. I don't think there's anything weird with the physics if you accept it's supposed to be an absurd situation.

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

"thank you, doctor"

"no sir, thank you!"

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 32 points 5 months ago

he was like 24-25 when Wolfenstein 3D came out (having designed like half the levels) and continued on, being an integral part of Doom, Doom 2, Hexen and Quake

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you probably just notice that because it doesn't make sense from your perspective.

it's probably more cost efficient for advertisers to just throw relevant ads at potential groups. Determining whether an individual already has the item is a waste of resources, and you probably don't notice when the ads are things you don't own.

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

with stuff like this, usually the objective is to advertise based on patterns across purchase histories

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

but the aspect of it that is most AI-like is the chat which is from LLMs.

It may have started 7 years ago, but it isn't a new or different technology than LLMs which are impressive but not actual thinking AI despite them presenting it that way and people interpreting it that way

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 46 points 6 months ago (6 children)

I keep seeing clips of this one specific robot and it just seems like it's an LLM. The comments on the clips are always people seemingly really believing it's thinking and is alive.

This robot makes me think there is a percentage of the population that believes we already have true general AI and I can see how people like that would think having it do a commencement speech was a good idea.

The university probably got paid for this, right?

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

do you know what an analogy is??

[–] ramirezmike@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

do you mostly communicate with people in your company or do you talk with external people too?

Don't get me wrong, I know teams has issues, I have my own list of complaints, I'm just surprised how different your complaints are.

 
 
view more: next ›