Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

316

Does One Line Fix Google? - A “Web” filter that presents what Google used to look like a decade ago | tedium.co (tedium.co)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Forget AI. Google just created a version of its search engine free of all the extra junk it has added over the past decade-plus. All you have to do is add "udm=14" to the search URL.

While Google made its AI-focused changes known on its biggest stage—during its Google I/O event—the Web filter was curiously announced on Twitter by Search Liaison Danny Sullivan.

As Sullivan wrote:

We’ve added this after hearing from some that there are times when they’d prefer to just see links to web pages in their search results, such as if they’re looking for longer-form text documents, using a device with limited internet access, or those who just prefer text-based results shown separately from search features. If you’re in that group, enjoy!*

More About

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/05/google-searchs-udm14-trick-lets-you-kill-ai-search-for-good/

https://venturebeat.com/ai/how-to-use-google-search-without-ai-the-udm14-work-around/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Agree. There's nothing we can do to bring back the ability to look up harm reduction information for drug users, for example.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Is this an area where the quality of results particularly degraded ?

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They're outright censored. Search for information on certain drugs (dosages, best practices, etc) and Google will not show you any information beyond studies about the drug and rehab sites.

Whereas DDG, Bing, etc will show all the sites dedicated to safe drug usage. At least they did a few years ago.

It's been documented by /r/drugs for a few years now.

That said, I don't particularly think this is a great example of Google fucking their own search up because there's reason to believe this may be due regulatory pressure.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Yes in my experience and the experience of many others. See this recent example:

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Erowid is the OG resource for that