Technology

59605 readers

3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

316

Does One Line Fix Google? - A “Web” filter that presents what Google used to look like a decade ago | tedium.co (tedium.co)

submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Forget AI. Google just created a version of its search engine free of all the extra junk it has added over the past decade-plus. All you have to do is add "udm=14" to the search URL.

While Google made its AI-focused changes known on its biggest stage—during its Google I/O event—the Web filter was curiously announced on Twitter by Search Liaison Danny Sullivan.

As Sullivan wrote:

We’ve added this after hearing from some that there are times when they’d prefer to just see links to web pages in their search results, such as if they’re looking for longer-form text documents, using a device with limited internet access, or those who just prefer text-based results shown separately from search features. If you’re in that group, enjoy!*

More About

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/05/google-searchs-udm14-trick-lets-you-kill-ai-search-for-good/

https://venturebeat.com/ai/how-to-use-google-search-without-ai-the-udm14-work-around/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tsonfeir@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The best way to fix Google is to not use it

[–] vonbaronhans@midwest.social 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's unfortunately still far more useful than other search engines, in my experience anyway. I haven't yet tried the paid search engine someone pointed out to me recently, Kagi, I think.

But given the cost of Kagi's tiers based on number of searches, it would have to be MUCH more useful to me than Google to really make it feel worth it.

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Kagi is good. I'm using the unlimited search tier. It's so nice not to have all the cruft in my searches.

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

The internet is going back to having to pay for useful services rather than getting it for free.

If this stops enshittenification, I support this.