this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
767 points (97.2% liked)

Greentext

4470 readers
1260 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh and a 52% increase compared to average isn't way more then?

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

3350/2200 = 1.52 -> 52% more than normal

Just using the numbers you provided

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

2200 isn't "normal." Both numbers are "normal" at different weights. If you reverse the ratio then you see 2200 is 0.656% of 3350 or that it has...

DECREASED BY A THIRD. WHO COULD HAVE PREDICTED THAT...?

Also, you randomly reused the 2200 you spouted earlier instead of running the calculator again for 150 lbs which would be 2,352. So it's actually even less than that.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 6 months ago

Just going by average number based on my local health guidelines.