this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
90 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

48323 readers
632 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
90
What are the differences between the 'base' of various Linux distributions? (slrpnk.net)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Sunny@slrpnk.net to c/linux@lemmy.ml
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been using linux desktop for a year or so now. One noteable thing i keep seeing is that one person will say I dont like XYZ distrobution because of its base. But I am still a little unsure what is meant by it. I am assuming the main difference between each base is the choice of package management(?). But what other factors/aspects that are important for the average user to know about each 'base'? This is probably quite a broad question to a rather technical answer, but appriciate any answers, and i'll try my best to understand and read up :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I would kill to see this in graph form with popularity included.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the graph (not the popularity)

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Great googly moogly!! I had no idea it was that perverse! Now I definitely need to see it culled by popularity.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ain't it glorious:D

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

sorry, best I can do is Glorious Eggroll Linux

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

Thanks, those are trying times when you offer me a glorious Eggroll. J/K Im running Nobara right now anyway :)

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

It's not really that bad. Start from the end to see which ones are still existing today.

But yeah, it would be nice if that last column indicated the level of popularity somehow.

[–] yala@discuss.online 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, perhaps understandably so, popularity is very hard to measure on Linux. Though, while far from representative, ProtonDB's measurements do exist and provide us some insights. As for the distros found on the chart:

  • Arch (base):
    • Endeavour
    • Garuda^[1]^
    • Manjaro
  • Debian (base):
    • Ubuntu
      • Linux Mint^[2]^
      • Pop_OS!
  • Fedora (base):
    • Nobara
  • NixOS
  • openSUSE

Note that Flatpak is not a distribution, but a packaging format.

BoilingSteam's article in which their thoughts and reflections are written can be found here.

  1. While it's technically not labeled, the blue-colored columns found right below openSUSE belong to Garuda; as can be seen here (from an earlier iteration of the graph).
  2. Technically, Linux Mint also has their Debian Edition. But, the vast majority of its users should be using the one based directly on Ubuntu.
[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

This is what I'm looking for, major thanks!