this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2024
1615 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3434 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Can you tell folks here what these "proper search engines" are because I can think of like five off the top of my head that all have issues similar to Google's. Yes, that includes paid search engine Kagi.

Almost all of them have similar issues except the self-hosted ones, which are a little beyond most people's basic capabilities.

[–] hersh@literature.cafe 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

DuckDuckGo is an easy first step. It's free, publicly available, and familiar to anyone who is used to Google. Results are sourced largely from Bing, so there is second-hand rot, but IMHO there was a tipping point in 2023 where DDG's results became generally more useful than Google's or Bing's. (That's my personal experience; YMMV.) And they're not putting half-assed AI implementations front and center (though they have some experimental features you can play with if you want).

If you want something AI-driven, Perplexity.ai is pretty good. Bing Chat is worth looking at, but last I checked it was still too hallucinatory to use for general search, and the UI is awful.

I've been using Kagi for a while now and I find its quick summaries (which are not displayed by default for web searches) much, much better than this. For example, here's what Kagi's "quick answer" feature gives me with this search term:

Room for improvement, sure, but it's not hallucinating anything, and it cites its sources. That's the bare minimum anyone should tolerate, and yet most of the stuff out there falls wayyyyy short.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I stopped recommending kagi on lemmy after the umpteenth person accused me of shilling.

Maybe I should take a screenshot of the £20 leaving my account each month!

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My issue is the Kagi CEO who won't take "No" for an answer and thinks he can just browbeat people over the head with his ideas until they agree with him.

He gives me every fucking reason to not give them a fucking penny because he reminds me all too well of people I have very good reason to not fucking trust.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 4 points 5 months ago

That's not an unreasonable reason not to subscribe.

I do have a bit of a fear that the company may hit a turning point. And he'll either tone it down a bit, or they'll lose a lot of people, both staff and subs.

[–] AceSLS@ani.social 9 points 5 months ago

I am pretty content with DuckDuckGo at the moment. It's sadly still worse than peak Google was but that's enshittification for ya

[–] elxeno@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

DDG, i switched when startpage got bought, and it was terrible, but i stayed for the !bang and just used !g sometimes, but it kept improving while google got worse, IMO it's better than google now (and i didn't even get the AI stuff yet).