this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
140 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Are you trying to say that Communism would have done a better job?

Yes.

We've already seen how that has played out a few times already.

Yes indeed, the USSR had affordable housing, low homelessness, high employment, no rents, no bills and after a devastating land war against a superior power that flattened half the country, they still had the science and tech to beat the US to space (and develop nuclear tech without cowtowing to nazi scientists) and got the GDR to decriminalise homosexuality all while US still had Jim Crow laws. It is obvious to anyone - especially the corpos - that a planned economy is superior in allocation of resources.

Sure luxuries weren't as available, but normal, working people lived comfortably and without financial stress.

That's not to say that USSR's own imperialist ambitions weren't misguided at best and crimes against humanity at worst, though.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

especially the corpos

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] robotica@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

On the surface it is true, but in reality all of those things came at the expense of people's liberty and the people themselves - they jailed or killed anyone that didn't agree with or was seen as an enemy of the state, resources were actually incredibly scarce and there was a lot of famine (just in the less important parts of the empire), nobody trusted anyone and people kept stealing things for themselves anyway. Oh also child labor and many many more things like that.

Like I understand the good part of communism, but oh God is the USSR the worst possible example of that, they didn't even have real communism anyway.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

Agreed on all bits except the liberty. USSR really wasn't throwing people in prison for being disagreeable, undesirables and those branded enemies of the state more than the US.