this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
538 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You make a good point, it"s definitly part of the outline of that social wound.

Some people are so fragile and the topic that they consider mere exposure as an attack or harrasement.

And whoever is most fragile seems to the decider for everyone, of what is forbidden.

Really a powerful position to be in ...

[–] cor@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

i don’t really see being too fragile as a powerful position….
it has definitely been abused by people pretending to be fragile… but the amount of very hostile, sexually aggressive people at many workplaces has made it this way, not the fragile people.
work is a place people are dependent on to make money to survive, with people they have to see every day.
a good friend of mine was a manager and very mildly cussed at a worker when they made a mistake… not even at her but just cussed as he was walking off….
she went to h.r., said it was because he hated lesbians (he doesn’t, has a lesbian aunt and several lesbian friends).
they fired him after ten years of being a good worker, working overtime or filling in whenever asked… never being late….
just fired him over one person saying one thing.
everyone else backed him up, but they didn’t care.
….
unions are pretty good, btw.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

anecdotes aren't data. even if this is true, which i don't believe it is to be honest, it pales in comparison to the innumerable discriminatory practices towards women and all sorts of minorities. also even in your own friend's probably distorted version of the events he's in the wrong.

[–] cor@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

my point is sometimes it does get abused…. but it’s in place for good reasons

and the fact that you think you know whether my friend was in the wrong or not means that you’re not worth talking to

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

anything can sometimes get abused. that's what abuse is; it's different from use.

what do you mean i think i know your friend is in the wrong? i said he is in the wrong even if you take him at his word. that's not me thinking it; it's him admitting it.

[–] cor@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you’re just boring concern troll trying to argue with everyone… i see your comment history.
every single comment is some condescending argumentative bullshit….

i’ll be blocking you and moving on to actual conversation

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

you don't even know what the word you use mean. what concern trolling?

wow my comments are argumentative‽ it's almost like I reply to a comment i disagree with and argue against it, maybe I should post more comments that say "this" instead so you can feel more in good company.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

let me guess, you're not a woman.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The fact that someone's gender makes a difference is part of that "social wound" they mentioned.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

of course it makes a difference. that's how power dynamics work. i think it's very rich to complain about people being fragile while demonstrating peak fragility that you can't just show porn to people who don't consent to it.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Where did I advocate for open porn in the workplace? My only point was that it's a sign of societal issues that there would be a gender based difference in how people see the issue. That's not anti-woman, it's just pointing out broader issues.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

i didn't say you were doing it. i was talking about the comment you referenced. seemed obvious.