Technology

59589 readers

2962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1015

Spotify has raised prices for the second time in a year, with no new benefits, after its CEO sparked outrage by claiming the cost of creating 'content' is 'close to zero' (www.techradar.com)

submitted 5 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

249 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It would be like, I don’t know, realizing after you’ve paid all of your bills and groceries everything you have $300 at the end of the month. Not a lot of wiggle room

Well that depends... if I have only $300 at the end of the month but I have already paid every bill and allocated $1,000,000 for entertainment, another $1,000,000 for personal expenses, another $1,000,000 for pet services, etc etc etc... the $300 left mean nothing... why do I need "wiggle room" when I can not just wiggle but literally run in every direction until I get tired and still not hit any limits?

The relatively small profit margin is a PR strategy... one that is working well on you giving you the false impression the company is "tight" when in reality, they are milking every bit of it before you get to that figure.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s not good PR because it makes me think they’re poorly structured and poorly allocating their money lol

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

if it makes you not buy into their subscription, then it's poor PR... if it makes you think they are not greedy fucks, then it's good PR

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

None of this impacts whether or not I pay them. It makes me think they are wasteful and greedy. Those are not mutually exclusive

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

if it makes you change your opinion of them but not enough to either pay them or stop paying them, then it means nothing to them

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The only reasons I should pay or not pay for something are 1) quality of service for the cost and 2) ethical considerations.

Poor management does not factor in unless i am dependent on it for work. This is purely entertainment. Their being dumbasses is not a factor.

You’re kind of moving the goalposts here as well. This is a silly debate at this point. All I said was I was surprised at the stated profit.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Ok, my only goal in replying to you was to point out that, your surprise is based on some fake, very easily manipulable information... They do this manipulation in part to portrait themselves as something they are not, which is part of the PR strategy whether it works on you or not... that is all