Technology

59569 readers

4136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

361

Outcry from big AI firms over California AI “kill switch” bill (arstechnica.com)

submitted 5 months ago by photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Asimov's stories were mostly about how it would be a terrible idea to put kill switches on AI, because he assumed that perfectly rational machines would be better, more moral decision makers than human beings.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

This guy didn't read the robot series.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I mean I can see it both ways.

It kind of depends which of robot stories you focus on. If you keep reading to the zeroeth law stuff then it starts portraying certain androids as downright messianic, but a lot of his other (esp earlier) stories are about how -- basically from what amount to philosophical computer bugs -- robots are constantly suffering alignment problems which cause them to do crime.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The point of the first three books was that arbitrary rules like the three laws of robotics were pointless. There was a ton of grey area not covered by seemingly ironclad rules and robots could either logicically choose or be manipulated into breaking them. Robots, in all of the books, operate in a purely amoral manner.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

downright messianic

Yeah, tell that to the rest of the intelligent life in the galaxy...

Oh, wait, you can't, because by the time humans got there these downright messianic robots had already murdered everything and hidden the evidence...

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Praise be to R. Daneel Olivaw!

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

Praise be! What a storied chatter. I also really like Asimov's fake names. They sound good in the ear

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oh man I forgot that

That is pretty eschatological in a wrathful human centric way, so my point unintentionally stands

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

This guy apparently stopped reading the robot series before they got to The Evitable Conflict.