this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
323 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

It's the retarded UIs, I think. I function the same way when having to use Windows, Android, typical applications and sites. It's an undertaking to use any of them to some end.

Now why do these people give up and offload it to us "sufficiently young" - they think these UIs are retarded for them, but work for us. Like "you wanted such things, you help me with them".

And they can't accept that such things are aimed at them and not us.

[–] ian@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes. When I use particularly badly designed software, where you know it's from a lazy, cost cutting money grabbing company, and you know you need 8x more clicks, and where any miss-step, means you have to start again, I have great trouble motivating myself to use it.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

Same. Then I go online and read how CLI's are too hard to use and Linux popularity would be better were its UI's more similar to Windows and MacOS, and that it's become easier to use now, and that Gnome is on the edge of making that the reality.

By the way, the best time for Linux UI's (easiness of use too) was IMHO when FVWM, Fluxbox, WindowMaker and Afterstep were still commonly used, and when people had a separate user (and possibly separate X session in Xephyr) for Skype, because it was the only proprietary program on their machine and hygiene\suspicion dictated isolating it. Look how far we have fallen.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't find this explanation remotely likely.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One can walled gardens, siloed services, lack of trust, oligopoly, widespread scams, legal pressure at everything good in the industry. It's not the only factor surely.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you accidentally a word? Sorry, I don't understand

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Ah. I mean, those factors are bad for developers, power users, and/or normal users, but I don't think they contribute to a lack of understanding of how computers work. It's that people don't ever have to interact with or understand the layer beneath the applications they use. That's not a sign of bad UI, it's actually a sign of good UI, but without proper education (the biggest factor imo) it does cause a lack of understanding. Ideally we'd live in a world where you don't need to understand the underlying technology, but it is easy to do so.

[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can critique UI design without using an ableist slur