this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
267 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (16 children)

Sorry to bring this argument to yet another thread, but the only reason why what is fundamentally the exact same feature was generally perceived as a disaster for Microsoft last week and what seems to be a net win for Apple this week is that man, they do seem to understand these things.

"Apple Intelligence" is a very stupid name, though.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.run 22 points 5 months ago (15 children)

I'd say it's because Apple's implementation isn't essentially spyware at it's core. The Microsoft implementation was straight up deranged and dangerous, frankly.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 0 points 5 months ago (14 children)

Nah, it's exactly the same. Arguably in some aspects more suspect, in that it doesn't seem to have an opt-out at all and it IS sending some data over the Internet for remote processing.

Presumably better local security than the first version MS announced, but we'll have to see when compared to the shipping version. Definitely obscuring what they're actually doing a lot more. It's Apple magic, not just letting some AI look at your screen and stuff.

But hey, ultimately, that's my point. The fact that they went on that stage, sold the exact same thing and multiple people are out here, of all places going "no, but this time it's fine" shows just how much better at selling stuff Apple is. I'm not particularly excited or intend to use either of these, but come on, Apple's messaging was so far ahead of MS's on this one.

[–] nave@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

doesn't seem to have an opt-out

It’s opt in

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Oh, did I miss that? Did they explain how that works and what AI features are still functional if you don't turn it on?

EDIT: I'm not being passive aggressive here, BTW. I genuinely don't know if they've explained this either way. If somebody can source it, I'm genuinely interested.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)