this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
167 points (98.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
253 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Piwigo is more like a shared gallery. Users create album/folders and upload individual photos, which other users can access. Piwigo has poor support for videos and no support for Live Photos.

Photoprism has only a single user for the free tier. It supports Live Photos and videos, and individual photo uploads. It does facial recognition tagging.

Immich supports video/Live Photos, facial recognition, and has multiple users, but it expects a full backup/synchronization (not individual photos). Sharing between users is manual, not automatic or permissions-based like Piwigo. Each user has access only to their own backups or shared albums.

In summary, I think Piwigo is the simplest to set up and use, but it doesn’t do much beyond photos - it’s a simple shared gallery. Photoprism is good and stable, but you have to pay a subscription for multiple user accounts. Immich is rapidly developing, which means things will break, but also it has the most features. My only issue with Immich is that I don’t want to use it as a backup - only as a “best of” shared gallery. While it’s possible with Immich, I would have to maintain an Immich album on my phone, and sync only that, and I would have to set up shares with other users manually.

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the detailed writeup, I think I understood it properly now!

Crazy that you have to pay for PhotoPrism to have more users!

Maybe they add these features you want to Immich? Given that it's still in development.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah the multiuser thing is a big deal for me now. Photoprism is okay but just the fact that there's a paid version irks me.

[–] theorangeninja@lemmy.today 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I wanted to selfhost photoprism soon but now I have to reconsider that.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I have an instance that runs half stably on an old PC. I will upgrade to an old server and then move to immich.

[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

I would probably do a one-time purchase but I don’t do subscriptions.