this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
647 points (97.8% liked)

Greentext

4437 readers
874 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] calavera@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but how much is this in regular units? 100kg?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Assuming that's metric pounds it's exactly 15kg.

[–] calavera@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So he lost 15kg out of of his ~140?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yep. Assuming 180cm that's at least 60kg too much, assuming 170cm 70kg.

But that's all rather iffy health-wise underbelly fat is the worst thing for men and as people have different patterns of fat distributions weight is not a particularly accurate individual proxy for health impact. Rule of thumb is that if your waist circumference is over a meter you should worry. Body fat percentage is even more accurate but who can measure that at home.