Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54669 readers

572 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

375

SponsorBlock (and DeArrow): "YouTube is currently experimenting with server-si…" - Fosstodon (fosstodon.org)

submitted 5 months ago by sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

YouTube is currently experimenting with server-side ad injection. This means that the ad is being added directly into the video stream.

This breaks sponsorblock since now all timestamps are offset by the ad times.

For now, I set up the server to detect when someone is submitting from a browser with this happening and rejecting the submission to prevent the database from getting filled with incorrect submissions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

I wonder if this is where AI might be useful where it's used to filter out all of the megacorp ads, popups, and other random garbage?

train LLMs on megacorp content and use it to filter out results
- sponsorblock adds this as a toggleable option just like the "skip segment" UI video overlay button

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 24 points 5 months ago

Using AI to fuck the megacorps would be amazing. Using their own tools against them.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Sounds wasteful, detection of ads could be detected with regular software, no?

[–] nawordar@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Even when you don't know the language, you can judge if something is an ad just by an overly excited tone of voice. I wonder if someone has tried writing an ad detection algorithm already. It would still be a lot heavier on resources than SponsorBlock.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 2 points 5 months ago

Often times that's the case but some ads also use other tones. Trying to make a super emotional and sad story or something.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How?

By the way, yes, it is.

[–] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago

That would be cool.

I guess my AMD Bulldozer TV PC is gonna have to go in the ewaste bin though. Its already stretched to its limit running Linux Mint, Firefox, uBlock Origin and Sponsorblock as it is

[–] spiderman@ani.social 12 points 5 months ago

imagine using Gemini for this, would be peak irony.

[–] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

They should still have to indicate that it's an ad, the problem is that they'll probably block you from seeking past an ad