this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
129 points (83.8% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pika Labs new generative AI video tool unveiled — and it looks like a big deal::The new Pika 1.0 tool comes after a $55 million funding round for the generative AI company and is a big step up in AI video production.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev -4 points 10 months ago (30 children)

I quite like AI art.

It's capable of generating things that we've not seen before because as hard as we try what we create always has a human filter on it.

If people don't like it it won't catch on anyway.

[–] Custodian1623@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (18 children)

Have you ASKED artists to draw these things they're supposedly incapable of?

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Ah yes, because the favorite part of the process for every artist is the hours spent going back and forth with their client touching up the most minor details instead of creating art they actually want to make..

Idk, I feel AI art only affects commercial artists who first and foremost care about making money off their art form. The ones that actually make art for the love of the craft (without expectation of getting anything in return) aren't really affected in any way.

TL;DR Let UBI free artists from the capitalistic yoke and let the oligarchs use AI to automate the soulless part of art creation that nobody enjoys anyways.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In what world is it a bad thing for someone to get paid for their skills? That's a bizarre spin to put on it.

And yes, UBI should definitely happen, but we shouldn't start painting the world with crap to do it.

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's fine to get paid for your skills, but from experience I can say that developing skills just to get paid is also rather soulless.

Since, sure, I can bet there're furry artists that love drawing sexy tigers to bits, but I can guarantee there's a not-so-small percentage that would much rather draw something else, but the yiffing money is too good to pass up on.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Being paid for your skills is service, not art. It can be art when your audience's money isn't the director.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)