this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
215 points (91.5% liked)

Games

16796 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
215
Mod That Makes ‘Baldur’s Gate 3’ Less Gay Gets Nuked After Players Revolt (www.vice.com)
submitted 11 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
147 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EtherealMoon@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's mildly interesting to consider that just stating the intent is the key difference. Not so much banning the mod as the modder, I guess.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the key part about this and the other times it's made the news I dislike. They don't actually care about the content in the mod, which is why 90% of these hateful mods remain up; those mod authors didn't put the same hate into the description, or the forum, or anywhere other than in the mod which would have to be downloaded and verified by someone to actually know it's a hateful piece of shit. And then when it makes the news when one jackass decides to spout racist/sexist/homo/transphobic shit in the description and get their mod removed, people point out all the other hateful mods that didn't get taken down and wonder why this one is being singled out.

Just remove all of them.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

"Remove all of them" implies a good question: what is "all" of them? All mods changing the models of characters? Changing the models of characters to make them more conventionally attractive? Less conventionally attractive? Changing the gender of characters? Changing men to women? Changing women to men? All mods that change skin color? Changing white skin to black skin? Changing black skin to white skin? All mods changing sexual orientation? Straight to queer? Queer to straight?

I think you should just allow everything, as long as it isn't associated with hate speech or discrimination. Which is exactly what's happening here.

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

No mods ever allowed, no modifications to any licensed content, in any kind, only vanilla play through, and only one time

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

All of them meaning all of the mods that clearly do things out of bigotry like turning black characters white, erasing gay characters, erasing trans issues, etc.

This isn't a particularly hard moral or ethical question to anyone who isn't trying to allow hateful content to spread.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Just checking, so if a mod was released that made a straight character gay, that would be fine, but one that made a gay character straight wouldn't be? Or would both be fine? Assuming no description for either, nothing but content.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

The big difference is that when mods remove a single gay character, it's always the only gay character in the game.

If the mod adding gay characters turns all the straight characters gay, that's erasure. If the new gay character has dialogue that is hateful toward straight people, it's still bigotry.

Adding representation to a game that has none is fine. Removing representation entirely isn't.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

So what if there are 3 gay characters, and there are 3 separate mods that each make one of the characters straight. Each single one does not remove representation, but having all 3 installed together would. Do you ban these 3 mods?

I don't know, I just feel like this is such an arbitrary choice. If you reduce the number to 2 gay characters in a game, with 2 different mods, is that still okay or should both be banned again?

Is it really a difference if you reduce the number of gay characters to 1? What if you split the mod up into two parts, one just removing all sexual remarks (effectively with the intention of making the char asexual), and another simply also adding hetero (so effectively making the char bi) remarks, and you then combine these two mods again to effectively make the 1 character hetero (official gay remarks removed, hetero remarks added)?

Sure, representation is great and I'm all for it, but I'm also for people being able to change whatever they want in their own game. In the end, it's only affecting them and no one else, which should be the prime directive of tolerance.