this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
809 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Moritz Körner, Member of the European Parliament, disclosed the decision on Twitter. Swedish publisher SVG said, “The question was removed at the last moment from Thursday’s ambassadorial meeting in Brussels”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuantumSoul@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not exactly orthogonal, left right could be viewed as an Principal Component Analysis reduced to only one axis. So there are correlations between stances but so much dimensions lost that it's nearly useless

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Two dimensions is 100% better than one.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's not true at all, mathematically. That's why we have a measurement for co-variance or correlation. If two dimensions are 100 correlation, they can most definitely be reduced to one.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 5 months ago

...but they're not in 100 percent correlation in this case, and you're naive if you think they are .

[–] QuantumSoul@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago

I agree and three dimensions is 100% better than two