this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
181 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
181
Pocket 386 is a mini laptop for retro computing with support for DOS and Windows 95 - Liliputing (liliputing.com)
submitted 5 months ago by schizoidman@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Seems like they missed a trick... Pocket Pentium. :)

[–] 555@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While cute, it would be false advertising for a 386.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If the point of this thing is to bring back the best of mid-90’s PCs in a compact package, they should have picked the top consumer CPU of the era.

[–] 555@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They should have used a raspberry pi and some emulators in that adorable little case.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Gonna disagree with you there. If the mission is to run 1990s apps, we need a 32bit x86 CPU.

[–] 555@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I have windows 3.1 running in an emulator faster than that eras hardware could ever dream. So, gonna have to double disagree.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago

Faster isn't always better -- there's software from the era that relied on hardware limitations to throttle itself -- but I'd think that emulators probably have pretty good support for such throttling.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

If someone wanted emulation, wouldn’t they have bought one of the many other tiny laptops that have been on the market for years?

I think the point of this is to run natively on vintage hardware.