Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1984

Switzerland mandates all software developed for the government be open sourced (calckey.world)

submitted 4 months ago by tek@calckey.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

150 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Switzerland mandates all software developed for the government be open sourced

Switzerland mandates software source code disclosure for public sector: A legal milestone

https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/news/new-open-source-law-switzerland

@technology@lemmy.world

#tech #libre

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Simply, you can't. I'm personally all for an open source alternative for electronic voting. I can bank online, but not vote online. I'd trust an open source online voting platform more than I'd trust poll workers to not skew some votes. I'd also like to be able to track my vote and ensure it was cast for the person I voted for.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Banking is completely different from voting from a security point of view. None of the parties in a bank transaction are anonymous, and there are numerous ways to retry or roll back a transaction. Computerized voting is more like crypto currency. 😝

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Computerized voting is more like crypto currency. 😝

Like it, but worse

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

you can't have secret ballot and have a secure, auditible online vote. One of the problems of social media is it has created enemy lists for authoritarian states.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You kind of can. Depends how fully auditable you want, but you can have cryptographically anonymized entries, that (I believe?) could even allow the original voter to track their vote, without enabling anyone else to track the vote back to the voter.

It's a different project, but GNU Taler have some interesting work on anonymized but not forgeable money transactions.

[–] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

The issue with online voting, no matter what you do, is that someone can force you under threat of violence to vote for a specific candidate, and watch to make sure you do it. Complete privacy in the voting booth is paramount to ensuring that everyone can vote freely.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Biggest vulnreability for online voting stands behind voter