Technology

59534 readers

3143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

533

Switzerland mandates government agencies use open-source software and disclose the source code of software developed by or for the public sector unless third-party rights or security concerns apply (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 3 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Switzerland has recently enacted a law requiring its government to use open-source software (OSS) and disclose the source code of any software developed by or for the public sector. According to ZDNet, this “public body, public code” approach makes government operations more transparent while increasing security and efficiency. Such a move would likely fail in the U.S. but is becoming increasingly common throughout Europe.

According to Switzerland’s new “Federal Law on the Use of Electronic Means for the Fulfillment of Government Tasks” (EMBAG), government agencies must use open-source software throughout the public sector.

The new law allows the codifies allowing Switzerland to release its software under OSS licenses. Not just that; it requires the source code be released that way “unless the rights of third parties or security-related reasons would exclude or restrict this.”

In addition to mandating the OSS code, EMBAG also requires Swiss government agencies to release non-personal and non-security-sensitive government data to the public. Calling this Open Government Data, this aspect of the new law contributes to a dual “open by default” approach that should allow for easier reuse of software and data while also making governance more transparent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This makes entirely too much sense. I'd love to see sanity prevail and this to trend, but I no longer have reasonable hope for much anymore.

I do secretly feel bad for any government workers that were using Photoshop and have to switch to Gimp though.

[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

GIMP is fucking awesome what are you on about

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Glad you love it. This is kind of a tired debate but specifically if you are well versed in Photoshop and try to convert to Gimp you feel like, well, a Gimp. From personal experience I tried for a solid year and it never felt right. I could still do the things I needed but it took longer and was more cumbersome. Probably a different story if you grow up with it.

[–] BakedCookie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago

Eh, really depends on the use case. For example if you want to edit something distributed in a psd format gimp won't even tell you something got imported wrong. So the file will import but will look wrong.

And then there's the UI. It just refuses to follow any current standards. Whether that's a good or bad thing depends on the user.

Personally I use affinity photo. Works for my use case and is a one time purchase product, which for me is ok.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 7 points 3 months ago

Soon: “Open source software or pirated copies of photoshop only”