this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
192 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 137 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I can see the allure for places wanting to keep certain trouble-makers out as a precaution, but this gets so close to a privatized social credit score that it's beyond uncomfortable.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I feel like you should not be allowed to record any data until there's a documented case with a police report at minimum. At that point, potentially restricting action becomes a legitimate security need.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Idk about that level of escalation being necessary, maybe just repeat offenses. Where I went to college it's got to be super serious for police to come into a bar.

Repeat fights, or pukes on the floor, or belligerence to staff are all things I would think would be decent grounds to be turned away by ID. I mean, that happens now at gas stations and restaurants with security cam photos saying "don't serve this person" posted at the register except it's more public.

I suppose it depends what data is recorded though, they don't need your home address.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

You can already handle people being repeated nuisances at a specific location without issue.

Sharing any information at all absolutely should require a police report (and I'm aware that they already violate privacy other ways; that's also not OK).

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

yeah, promising security/convenience over liberty is how they reel us in every time

that and protecting the kids