this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
431 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But kWh/kg doesn't account for additional energy sinks or drive train efficiency

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, for a specific car, but Samsung isn’t making cars, just a battery that could go in a number of different vehicles. So all we’re really able to compare is batteries, not full vehicle efficiency.

If they’re intending to suggest this new battery, when fitted in an existing EV (say a Model Y) would result in a 600 mile range, then it’s interesting, but all other things (drivetrain, drag, vehicle weight) would have to remain constant.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Oh dang I'm the fool. You're 100% correct. I assumed it was a full vehicle system with a battery.