this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
755 points (96.0% liked)

Games

16796 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Except that Quake is a good engine.

GameBryo is and has always been shit. There are other games from competent devs on that engine, and they also are full of problems.

Building a house with a solid foundation is still important. Quake is bedrock. GameBryo is sand.

[–] Pseudonaut@lemmy.today 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why is everyone always saying GamBryo is shit? I hear this over and over again, but I never hear why.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 16 points 11 months ago

I think it's because it was designed to be able to handle hundreds of persistent objects in a scene as a priority over graphical performance. That's why Bethesda games have so much collectable junk - because they can.

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

I think GameBryo can be good, but it needs some badass people working on it, and loads of time and money poured into it.

And unfortunately I just don’t see Bethesda dedicating the resources needed to truly overhaul it.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

GameBryo doesn't exist in their engine anymore. I'm reasonably confident that there is hardly anything left in that engine from GameBryo. Their engine has plenty of issue, but they're technically fixable with the right investments. I always disagree that they need to switch engines, and I used to disagree that they should (because it would incur a huge technical lag). They haven't seemed to make the investments that they need to to make it acceptable for a modern engine though, so if they aren't willing to do that they need to change something.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

GameBryo doesn't exist in their engine anymore. I'm reasonably confident that there is hardly anything left in that engine from GameBryo.

The bones of it are still very much there, holding everything else together. If you've ever made scripts for mods, you'd know this.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think the most telling moments are when you pick something up off a table and everything starts floating.