Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

716

Bitcoin is Stupid and Does Not Deserve an Emoji (blog post) (thedabbler.patatas.ca)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by smallpatatas@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

367 comments fedilink hide all child comments

35 crypto companies got together to make a change dot org petition called "Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji".

F that

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You think you can fool people by using a simple straw man argument technique? Come on, get your shit together. Bitcoin is infrastructure as anyone can submit transactions to the network and they will be seamlessly processed. As simple as that

[–] RxBrad@infosec.pub -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know that shouting "straw man!" is the first step of trying to deflect from being wrong on the Internet... But if you're going to do it, at least know what a straw man is.

My argument is that "Infrastructure" != "anyone can do it".

Infrastructure is something that benefits and maintains the general public. Bitcoin benefits a handful of cryptobros, billionaires... and most importantly ransomware rings.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Your straw man is "shit in their pants"

Read your own comments dude

[–] RxBrad@infosec.pub -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The person I was arguing with was saying that "infrastructure is anything which is something anyone can do". I gave an example of something that anyone can do which isn't infrastructure.

It's absolutely a direct refuation

a counter-example which disproves their original statement. It's not a "straw man", as much as you get mad and scream that it is.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 0 points 3 months ago

So you were wrong from the beginning. He never said "infrastructure is anything which is something anyone can do". You are the only one who said it. He provided an example of a service provided by the infrastructure in question