this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
404 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3376 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No sane court? So it has a real chance of being decided by The Supreme Court...

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They'd never even hear it. To give this lawsuit any credibility, they'd have to effectively say that businesses spending/donating money is not free speech. Which would effectively be the opposite of Citizens United.

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You think they give a shit about consistency?

[–] solomon42069@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

All that matters is the sponsorship tier - will you be flying the judge out to a vacation? Buying their mother a house? The outcome is solely dependent on your investment in the court. Justice.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Maybe they’ll say billionaires can sue as long as it’s an official act.