Memes

45704 readers

1078 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml

sexy_peach@feddit.de

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

318

laughing ass off at hacks (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by no_nothing@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We sure do not have the same definition of art!

Art does not, in my opinion, need an observer to be art.

If you think the sky is beautiful then that does not make it art, or everything would be art so nothing would be art.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

everything would be art so nothing would be art

A lot of artists share that thought

[–] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 1 points 3 months ago

That everything is art ? Or that everything can be art?

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social -3 points 3 months ago

If everything is art, AI art is art, and that's obviously a disgusting communist lie. Where's the line?

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I like to think that anything that CAN be art, if it can be meaningful for someone.

A pebble might be ignored by most people, but a geologist might be fascinated by it, I think that becomes art.

Even in something worked-on at the very least the artist is the observer, and they will put into it the meaning they perceive in it, and if they never share with anyone it's still art.

My opinion.

[–] Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com 1 points 3 months ago

Every opinion is valid when it comes to art!

Personally I just think the creative process is a part of it so I don't see randomness being art.

That doesn't mean it's not beautiful! Beauty can be found everywhere and definitely is in the eye of the observer... IMO!