Technology

59627 readers

2911 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

129

Major shifts at OpenAI spark skepticism about impending AGI timelines (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Hu? No, that is not what I meant, well it surly can be a machine learning based filter, but why has it to be AGI? This filtering is a job that we can give to a "traditionally" trained AI or some human genius algorithm crafter finds a way to achieve this using pure logic 🤷🏻‍♀️ For me it feels like this is the way, it goes.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Because how could a piece of code that can do that, not already be AGI? It would have to be able to understand EVERYTHING, and do so PERFECTLY.

Only AGI could comprehend and filter input data that well. Nothing less would be enough. How could it be?

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

No it just needs to categorise into important / probably true and not important / probably nonsense, as a first step

Here are Johnny harris’s words describing what I am talking about (he describes it in order to able to talk about lies better)

https://youtu.be/yWgG3Mgn2Gc?si=bPcYhRAZNaY2qIJS

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Right...

As if critical thinking is super easy, basic stuff, that humans get right every time without even trying. You actually think getting a computer to do it would be easier than making the AGI?

You are VERY confused about how thinking works.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don’t need AGI to categorise new info as probably true / probably wrong based on your base knowledge. This a simple machine learning task.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No it isn't.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

load more comments (2 replies)