this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
184 points (85.9% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Requires kernel-level access

What does that mean to the rest of us?

[–] dosse91@lemmy.trippy.pizza 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

It means it's what we in the trade call "a nothingburger". On Windows you need to explicitly install a malicious driver (which in turn requires to you to disable signature verification), on Linux you'd have to load a malicious kernel module (which requires pasting commands as root, and it would probably be proprietary since it has malware to hide and as every nvidia user knows, proprietary kernel modules break with kernel updates)

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

So install a multiplayer game, it has kernel level anticheat that opens a bunch of security holes, game over.

Kernel level access is absolutely achievable in the real world.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

On Windows you need to explicitly install a malicious driver (which in turn requires to you to disable signature verification)

Not to be contrarian, but hackers have signed malicious code with compromised Microsoft driver certificates, so it's not out of the question that it could be snuck in without having to turn off signing.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, it does not mean you would need to do that.

The more likely scenario is an attacker using another vulnerability, either in the OS itself or in a vendor-supplied component like a driver or anti-cheat module, to gain a foothold for this one. Chaining exploits is a very common technique. (What "trade" are you in, exactly?)

Apply the mitigations when they become available for your hardware, folks.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This article should say, with this one easy hack you can control an AMD users PC, all you gotta do is break into their home at 10pm right before they log off from browsing reddit and bam access.

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Sounds like a plan!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 months ago

It means that a malicious actor would already need to have hacked your computer quite deeply through some other vulnerability (or social engineering) before they could take advantage of this one. But I don't agree with another commenter here that this is a "nothingburger": this vulnerability enables such a hacker to leave undetectable malware that you just can't remove from the computer even if you replace everything but the motherboard. That's significant, particularly for anyone who might be a target of cyber-espionage.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago