this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
273 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 months ago

No, but that's not AMD's fault.

[–] zik@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Not in reliability...

But they're probably still selling more CPUs to your average buyer who always buys Intel, doesn't read tech news and never even heard about the controversy.

[–] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And they're still somehow generating twice the revenue with Xeons vs. what AMD does with EPYCs. Who keeps buying all these Xeons!?

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 1 points 3 months ago

Amd dominanace started with 5000 series 4 years ago, it takes time for corpos to change vendor like that I would assume. So it takes years to play out.