this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
964 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3196 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Is it?

I once told a teacher I'd write ten times the number of required words as long as I could pick a subject that actually warranted it. And I followed through.

The rare times I got prompts that were actually good, I would run out of paper on which to express everything I wanted expressed. (Yes, I've done writing assignments writing by hand.)

Outside academia no-one is enforcing a word-count. Which means you can just write good prose. Using a lot of words to say very little, is not good prose.

Unless you're dealing with people that don't actually read what you write and instead just look at net weight of the word-salad you threw at them, the content of the text is what matters.

Who takes offence at only a single paragraph, if it addresses their every concern and insecurity, and they are left feeling seen as they reach the final word?

Only people who don't actually read things, or have no reading comprehension, needing the same thing said three time in different ways in one message.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's the same philosophy, yeah. That more words means more substance and more "respect" or whatever to the message.

It's not rational at all, but people genuinely don't think that way. (Unless it's a forum/social media, then 3 paragraphs is a wall of text that needs to have a 5 word TLDR, because none of it is rational).

The exaggerated version of a simple message once you have a working relationship is silly, but there are way too many times you don't get to a working relationship at all without a wall of bullshit.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, but do the people you're referring to actually appreciate prose, or just skim-read through everything?

Because I'd wager they're the latter, and at that point you don't even need to try to write something good. It's fine to send them three paragraphs where the second and third ones just paraphrase the first.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Paraphrasing the first multiple times is still a big, distracting extra cognitive load, and it needs to hold up if they actually do pay attention to it. One time they notice the obvious bullshit can end a relationship. I won't use an LLM for anything like this because it's stupid, but that's why people are doing it.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You're saying once they see the pointless fluff they themselves ask of people, for what it is, they'll feel insulted?

Paraphrasing yourself comes with built-in deniability. "Oh it's just something I tend to do, I don't mean anything by it, I can make an effort to stop if you like". And then boom, you get to be concise.

There is no way of bloating your prose that doesn't come off as insulting when done with people who don't appreciate volume over quality.