this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
330 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
330
X says it is closing operations in Brazil due to judge's content orders (www.reuters.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by clot27@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] downpunxx@fedia.io 66 points 3 months ago (5 children)

not sure what everyone's so excited about "The X service remains available to the people of Brazil, the platform said on Saturday."

seems like they're just closing their offices so they don't get fined or arrested

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

true, but they had a local presence for reasons that benefited them; legal, operational, commercial, strategic, whatever. So I'll take it as good news.

[–] fernandofig@reddthat.com 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But it isn't. Now people get to spread misinformation to Brazilians with no repercussions.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

and do you think there were repercussions before?

whatsapp does this misinformation job immensely better

[–] fernandofig@reddthat.com 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

and do you think there were repercussions before?

For X? Sure, that's why they're leaving in the first place - by not complying to the judge's orders, they'd surely get slapped with fines and such. As a company, it makes sense to leave and avoid being accountable, but given the influence they (sadly) still have in the media, avoiding those repercussions and letting bad actors do their thing, they're adding gasoline to the burning world.

The fact that Whatsapp is more popular in Brazil than X is beside the point.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

They can just block the IP in Brazil too

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess because they didn't read the article. Although even the headline implies this with the word "operations", so I guess the people celebrating in this thread are just stupid and/or coping.

[–] downpunxx@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"gathering ye schadenfreude where ye may"

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Seems to be the way on Lemmy. People are so desperate for a circlejerk that they just start inventing their own reality to accommodate one.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 3 months ago

What's going to happen the next time the government or judges called them from something? They don't respond and the judge are going to order the ISP to stop forward data from and to them, blocking them on Brazil. It's not even going to be the first time, brazillian judges have had fights with whatapp before, and for a couple of days whataap have been blocked. Whatapp move like 10% of the Brazilian economy, so it was solved quickly, Twitter is nowhere as relevant and nobody is going to care when its end blocked.

[–] clot27@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Complete X ban doesn't seem too far-fetched to me after this, as they have closed the offices, they won't be able to moderate stuff...

[–] downpunxx@fedia.io -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

~~that's not how the internet works, clot~~ i think i read your post reply incorrectly

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Say that to governments that wants to locally ban tiktok.