cley_faye

joined 2 years ago
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Isn't it also more prone to violently explode under appropriate management?

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ultimately, this could highlight the incredibly high value of wikipedia as a common ressource, and might lead to better things there.

Maybe.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's the size of the rock you've been living under in the past 10 months or so?

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I doubt any govt. member anywhere did any actual research about tylenol or autism, because if they did there would not have been any large scale announcement about false reports, and no lawsuit.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

they did the research and safety testing on it

You're missing the largest air quotes of the year here.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Best best thing is to have fucking human oversight over a machine telling us something.

Sure, having (supposedly) unbiased model running without third-party opaque interference is great, but LLM will always be statistical machines, by design. Nothing it does have value if it's not checked by something that's smart enough, and aside from deterministic outcomes we can express with pure logic, that requires a human.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

You can feel the smart in these.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

I really want this to be true, because not only I believe that would be the immediate outcome, but also because it would be hilarious.

But a somewhat credible source that's not wrapped in "allegedly" and old stories would really help drive the point home.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Automation with a lot of validation steps that are not very obvious. Because if they were, we'd have automated them away.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I honestly don’t mind as long as it’s down with permission

From Microsoft "fuck you now all your files are on onedrive", sure, they can be trusted. After all, it's not like microsoft "I'm wiping this bootloader for you" have done anything shady before. Microsoft "I'll revert those default apps settings because you clearly wanted edge when you changed everything to firefox/chrome" is THE company that respects user decisions. Microsoft "I'll update and reboot now, fuck you" really knows how to stay in line and not do the opposite of what users want.

Really, what could go wrong in believing that Microsoft "I shit you not, you want to open that link in edge even though you uninstalled it" will respect the end-looser checking or unchecking a checkbox.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

First day using a microsoft product? Checkbox magically checking themselves is as old as my first baby wee windows update.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Their problem is that they were slower than some, their solution is half baked at best, and it’s prohibitively expensive

Sounds like a lot of company these days.

view more: next ›