Technology

59605 readers

3397 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1190

YouTube is Losing The War Against Adblockers (www.howtogeek.com)

submitted 3 months ago by AnActOfCreation@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

465 comments fedilink hide all child comments

YouTube is intensifying efforts to combat adblockers, including blocking video playback and warning users of potential account suspension.
Increased ads on YouTube have driven many users to adblockers, hurting both YouTube’s ad revenue and content creators reliant on ad-based income.
Despite these measures, many users are leaving YouTube or finding workarounds, leading creators to seek alternative revenue streams off-platform.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And the content creators I personally know have shown me the amount of money they get from Premium users, and it's sometimes less than the value of an ad-supported user, even though the Premium user generates more revenue than an ad-supported one.

Can you expand on this? I don't follow what you mean here

[–] grozzle@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i read it as - the Premium money is mostly going to YouTube HQ, instead of to video makers.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Every creator I've seen talk about it said they get more from Premium viewers, so that's why I'm confused

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

I'm not entirely sure myself, but the people I'm talking to have much smaller channels than the ones I often see talking about their Premium earnings, so that may have something to do with it.

I'm not sure if this has an impact as well, but I do know there has also been a lot of users spoofing their locations to regions where the cost of Premium is cheaper (and thus generates less revenue for everyone involved) the vast majority of their viewer numbers are from the US though, so that doesn't seem to make much sense.

I do believe it can simply vary in terms of revenue-per-view depending on the creator, though.

Regardless, I think that, overall, YouTube and YouTubers would make more money if YouTube didn't price Premium so high, and actually invested a portion of their profits into original content for subscribers. I have a hard time believing that YouTube is generating anywhere near $168/yr from ad supported users, compared to the monthly Premium subscriber cost.

YouTube's share of Google's global revenue is around 10%, but it would need to account for nearly half of Google's yearly revenue to be earning the same rate as Premium costs, and that's already including current higher-paying Premium subscribers.

Obviously, not every user is going to be buying Premium if it becomes cheaper, but YouTube isn't incentivizing Premium users past just "please don't use an adblocker, pay us instead." which I think will inevitably lead to them just not converting enough new subscribers.