Technology

59589 readers

2962 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

342

When A.I.’s Output Is a Threat to A.I. Itself | As A.I.-generated data becomes harder to detect, it’s increasingly likely to be ingested by future A.I., leading to worse results. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 2 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 51 points 2 months ago (5 children)

So now LLM makers actually have to sanitize their datasets? The horror....

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

that first L stands for large. sanitizing something of this size is not hard, it's functionally impossible.

[–] ekky@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

You don't have to sanitize the weights, you have to sanitize the data you use to get the weights. Two very different things, and while I agree that sanitizing a LLM after training is close to impossible, sanitizing the data you give it is much, much easier.

load more comments (3 replies)