It helps spread false information widely
It puts a lot of control of information in a single companies hands
It hurts the underlying sources
When google provides the info directly, and the first hand sources has become completely obsolete and shut down, what would new information stem from? It's an inherently unstable and short sighted solution.
this is problematic on multiple levels.
ground water is a completely different beast. This device harvests moisture from the air.
You are wrong on that last part
In accordance with Nobel's will, the prize is selected by the Norwegian Nobel Committee, a five-member committee appointed by the Parliament of Norway unlike all the other awards chosen by the Swedish Nobel Committee.
It's easy to crush the competition when you purposely take a loss as an investment in future market share.
no, but misuse, yes.
Those are illegal in most places, just fyi
matter changes state based on temperature
This is a gross oversimplification and your experiment proves that :)
Wouldn't that be somewhere along the lines of $1000 per person, if divided over every single person in the world?
No it doesn't negate the forst two. It only addresses the second, and bypassing the results completely, exascerbates the problem quite a bit.
great argument.