FiskFisk33

this sends a clear message though. No the old "just hook them, then we have guaranteed income forever" isn't actually working. That's great.

Thats why I'm saying borders on. I know it's not technically plagiarizing, but they really did just lift the video into text form and call it their own article.

Yes they credit her, but what did they actually add themselves?

The article is essentially a text version of that video.

Huh, this borders on plagiarism.

This article is essentially a transcription of this video https://youtu.be/WnzR5aOElvw

but only if the platform is sufficiently large

hm, that sounds sensible actually

...no?

well, "scammers in iran" doing it, and "iran" doing it, is two very different statements.

nice job blindly taking the comment at face value while completely ignoring the context.

I'm pretty happy with my samsung. No really, hear me out, if power cuts out, when it resumes, the tv auto starts on the same input.

I have it connected to a pc, and use a smart plug for turning on and off. Haven't seen a trace of the smarts for years :D

I hear he was a pretty good speaker 🫣

Google controls search results and has been caught meddling. Which negates the first two.

No it doesn't negate the forst two. It only addresses the second, and bypassing the results completely, exascerbates the problem quite a bit.

Cry me a river.

great argument.

• It helps spread false information widely

• It puts a lot of control of information in a single companies hands

• It hurts the underlying sources

When google provides the info directly, and the first hand sources has become completely obsolete and shut down, what would new information stem from? It's an inherently unstable and short sighted solution.