this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
2278 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2910 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
2278
Firefox rolls out Total Cookie Protection by default to all desktop users worldwide | It is Firefox’s strongest privacy protection to date, confining cookies to the site where they were created (blog.mozilla.org)
submitted 2 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
226 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Does this stop me from adding to my website an iframe to facebook where facebook can keep its cookies for my user? That would be great but I doubt it.

[–] monogram@feddit.nl 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

IIRC an iframe contents is treated as a separate window, so cookies aren’t shared either

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] monogram@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago

That’s horrific WHY?

do not add any event listeners for message events. This is a completely foolproof way to avoid security problems. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but the separate window can be on a different domain. Now you have a way to share cookies across multiple websites on different domains if all of them include an iframe to this external domain. And you can use in-browser messages (see window.postMessage()) to communicate between iframes and main window.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I haven't worked with HTML since 1999; I hate that I'm just now finding out that iframes are somehow still a thing in the modern world. What the actual fuck. Why? Don't we have some fancy HTML5 or Ajax or something that can replace them?

[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah i don't know why, probably exactly because is such a neglected feature that it offers workarounds for some limitations, like in the case of cookie-related patterns.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

HTML5 can store HTML files inside of HTML files, allowing you to do what an iframe does but with a static (or updated when the page refreshes or whatever) html page

AJAX also has something that can replace iframes

But iframes continue to exist likely for legacy and how easy it is to get a basic page running using them for home projects