Games

16785 readers

826 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Concord : why did it take 8 years to make? (hackertalks.com)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/games@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Concord is very polished. But it still seems fairly contained, a bunch of heroes, a handful of maps. Where did the 8 years go?

Firewalk studios has 169 employees as far as i can tell.

They use unreal engine, no single player campaign

Where did the time go?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I have no inside knowledge of Firewalk, but I can take some guesses, some formed by a small amount of lived experience.

The original team was probably a handful of people. I saw a quote that said that in some ways, this game has been in development for about 10 years, so probably a skeleton crew starting with the foundation for those first two years. Then probably bootstrapping a team of a dozen developers for the next two years. That would take us to about 2018, and we start to get into the venture capital era of video game financing in the wake of Fortnite and PUBG. At that point, they'd be building a thing that they know how to aim for, the Overwatch idea, and convincing investors that they'll achieve the hockey stick graph where their initial users will stick around, get others to play with them, and the audience exponentially expands. What's their hook? These cutting-edge graphics characters and cut-scenes. They're not cheap or quick to make. Then they're prototyping, testing, throwing things out, prototyping something new, testing again, and repeat. This is easily the next handful of years until they get a deal with Sony, then eventually purchased. COVID-19 happens in the middle here, too.

I'm sure some of the lean startup approach is discarded to fit in more with how Sony likes to launch a product, but while it would have saved them a lot of money that was blown on the sunk cost fallacy, I doubt it would have resulted in a much more successful game.