this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
178 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16800 readers
569 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 115 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Japanese company applying Japanese law to global consumers. This needs to stop. Its fine to apply Japanese law in Japan to Japanese consumers, but not other countries.

Nintendo, I used to love you, and now you are the single biggest contributor to me hating you.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that's only gonna stop when social media companies enable country blocking for streamers to prevent their content from being shown to Japanese audiences.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You really think they would stop in that case?

Nintendo is writing their own laws through terms of service, enforced with kill switches built into their games.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can't write their own laws and their terms of service can't go against your local laws if they want to provide their services in your State (in the general sense, not in the USA sense), so customer protection laws can solve the issue if Nintendo won't solve it themselves.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 7 points 2 months ago

They absolutely shouldn't be able to, but companies are constantly pushing the boundaries and seem to be getting away with their bullshit bullshit depressingly often.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Supposedly this is how the animetuber community were able to get relief from copy strikes after TNM took a public stand against the practice when his one piece series got struck

[–] xep@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

Nintendo is writing their own laws

No, they aren't.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

It's as if customer protection laws are necessary... A whole bunch of things found in EULA doesn't apply to me just because of where I live and the fact that we have them here.

[–] Thann@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

Nintendo, knows they can coerce YouTube into destroying peoples channels, by sung them in Japan, so they get to write any rules they want.

[–] mormund@feddit.org -1 points 2 months ago

Not sure how Japanese law has anything to do with this. I'm pretty sure under US law (the one that ultimately matters for streaming) leaves all the rights of recorded videos of the game with the right holders of the game. That you're allow to record/stream games at all has no legal precedent, it's just a wise business decision by publisher to not forbid it (anymore).

And legality aside. As a dev I wouldn't want racist or bigoted streamers to show my game and make money off of my work. Same with leakers. Sure for a big company I don't care but if someone leaked an indie devs work, we would consider it a dick move as well.