Technology

59589 readers

2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

914

Kids who use ChatGPT as a study assistant do worse on tests (hechingerreport.org)

submitted 2 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

199 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does AI actually help students learn? A recent experiment in a high school provides a cautionary tale.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania found that Turkish high school students who had access to ChatGPT while doing practice math problems did worse on a math test compared with students who didn’t have access to ChatGPT. Those with ChatGPT solved 48 percent more of the practice problems correctly, but they ultimately scored 17 percent worse on a test of the topic that the students were learning.

A third group of students had access to a revised version of ChatGPT that functioned more like a tutor. This chatbot was programmed to provide hints without directly divulging the answer. The students who used it did spectacularly better on the practice problems, solving 127 percent more of them correctly compared with students who did their practice work without any high-tech aids. But on a test afterwards, these AI-tutored students did no better. Students who just did their practice problems the old fashioned way — on their own — matched their test scores.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember the teachers telling us not to trust Wikipedia, but they had utmost faith in the shitty old books that were probably never verified by another human before being published.

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i mean, usually wikipedia's references ARE from those old books

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Eh I find they’re usually from a more direct source. The schoolbooks are just information sourced from who knows where else.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know about your textbooks and what ages you're referring to but I remember many of my technical textbooks had citations in the back.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep, students these days have no idea about the back of their books and how useful the index can be and the citations after that.

Even after repeatedly pointing it out, they still don't make use of it. Despite the index being nearly a cheat code in itself.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait, kids don't use the index? How do they find things in the book?

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

They try and use google, which doesn't tell you anything about the information contained in the book. Or they complain about not being able to find the page they are told to look for.