this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
914 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Does AI actually help students learn? A recent experiment in a high school provides a cautionary tale. 

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania found that Turkish high school students who had access to ChatGPT while doing practice math problems did worse on a math test compared with students who didn’t have access to ChatGPT. Those with ChatGPT solved 48 percent more of the practice problems correctly, but they ultimately scored 17 percent worse on a test of the topic that the students were learning.

A third group of students had access to a revised version of ChatGPT that functioned more like a tutor. This chatbot was programmed to provide hints without directly divulging the answer. The students who used it did spectacularly better on the practice problems, solving 127 percent more of them correctly compared with students who did their practice work without any high-tech aids. But on a test afterwards, these AI-tutored students did no better. Students who just did their practice problems the old fashioned way — on their own — matched their test scores.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

IKR?

Cheaters who cheat rather than learn don't learn. More on this shocking development at 11.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Using ChatGPT as a study aid is cheating how?

[–] blackbirdbiryani@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because a huge part about learning is actually figuring out how to extract/summarise information from imperfect sources to solve related problems.

If you use CHATGPT as a crutch because you're too lazy to read between the lines and infer meaning from text, then you're not exercising that particular skill.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't disagree, but thats like saying using a calculator will hurt you in understanding higher order math. It's a tool, not a crutch. I've used it many times to help me understand concepts just out of reach. I don't trust anything LLMs implicitly but it can and does help me.

[–] WordBox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Congrats but there's a reason teachers ban calculators... And it's not always for the pain.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In some cases I'd argue, as an engineer, that having no calculator makes students better at advanced math and problem solving. It forces you to work with the variables and understand how to do the derivation. You learn a lot more manipulating the ideal gas formula as variables and then plugging in numbers at the end, versus adding numbers to start with. You start to implicitly understand the direct and inverse relationships with variables.

Plus, learning to directly use variables is very helpful for coding. And it makes problem solving much more of a focus. I once didn't have enough time left in an exam to come to a final numerical answer, so I instead wrote out exactly what steps I would take to get the answer -- which included doing some graphical solutions on a graphing calculator. I wrote how to use all the results, and I ended up with full credit for the question.

To me, that is the ultimate goal of math and problem solving education. The student should be able to describe how to solve the problem even without the tools to find the exact answer.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] WordBox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Use the rod, beat the child!

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Take a college physics test without a calculator if you wanna talk about pain. And I doubt you could find a single person who could calculate trig functions or logarithms long hand. At some point you move past the point to prove you can do arithmetic. It's just not necessary.

The real interesting thing here is whether an LLM is useful as a study aid. It looks like there is more research necessary. But an LLM is not smart. It's a complicated next word predictor and they have been known to go off the rails for sure. And this article suggests its not as useful and you might think for new learners.

[–] WordBox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Chem is a long forgotten memory, but trig... It's a matter of precision to do by hand. Very far from impossible... I'm pretty sure you learn about precision before trig.. maybe algebra I or ii. E.g. can you accept pi as 3.14? Or 3.14xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Trig is just rad with pi.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember reading somewhere that pi to only 5 digits can calculate the circumference of the earth within an error of about 50cm. Hell NASA only uses like 15 places I think.

[–] WordBox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Which makes trig calculations by hand easier.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

ChatGPT hallucinations inspire me to search for real references. It teaches we cannot blindly trust on things that are said. Teachers will commonly reinforce they are correct.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I do honestly have a tendency to more thoroughly verify anything AI tells me.