this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
240 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Just FYI, this wasn't clips of porn. This was actual movies with nude scenes.

Still not entirely sure how I feel about it, but I do agree it's not the same thing.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 57 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Assuming he did not upload the whole movie or demanded money for those scenes, I don't see how that's a good case for the copyright holder. Movie snippets are used all the time, everywhere, including YouTube, without this being much of an issue. The most glaring one there would be the auto detection, which again, is more to prevent actual piracy being shared.

Edit: Also, why is he getting arrested instead of getting a letter?!

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why do you not know how to feel about it?

To me it's just clip collection, you could have a collection of all death scenes or car cashes. They're all just clips from videos people agreed to make for public consumption.

Just FYI, this wasn't clips of porn. This was actual movies with nude scenes.

Why does that matter? To a horny enough 14 year old there is no difference.