this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
1339 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (34 children)

No, because that isn’t Linus’s take.

I think he’s referencing a stream once upon a time where Linus discussed the arguments around streaming and it’s impact on creators, from a creator’s perspective .

But because he uttered something in favor of ads on his videos-which is how they got paid-he’s now considered ultra pro invasive ads by the user above, who professes to not actually watching Linus

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (33 children)

No, it was most definitely Linus's take. Louis Rossman covered this a couple of years ago. Direct Linus quote from that Twitter thread:

Ad blocking is the exact same thing as piracy. Literally the exact same thing.

Linus himself covers those Twitter comments, and defends them further, in this video.

@Kbobabob@lemmy.world @A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago (12 children)

And yet he never said not to adblock, so the only thing he claims are the categorization of adblocking.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue this as well. I see it in a similar way. Linus is obviously not trying to sit on some high horse and condemn piracy, he's just calling a spade a spade.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No, he's calling a spade a backhoe. Piracy is one of two things, depending on your definition:

  • sharing/accessing copyrighted material you don't have the rights for (i.e. seeding or downloading a torrent)
  • circumventing technical restrictions on copyrighted content (e.g. DRM)

Blocking ads does neither of those things, it merely blocks loading of content that you don't want to see. It's basically the modern version of a DVR, where you can choose to cut out portions of a video that you don't want (e.g. the ads).

These things are technically piracy:

  • using a YouTube downloader
  • sharing downloaded YouTube videos
  • posting a YouTube video that you don't own
  • using substantial portions of a YouTube video you don't own w/o authorization in your own video (i.e. beyond Fair Use)

Blocking ads isn't one of those things, neither is skipping over parts of a video you don't want to see (i.e. the sponsor segment).

Blocking ads reduces revenue to Google and the video creator. That doesn't make it piracy, it's just being a jerk to the platform and the creator.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)