this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] pokemaster787@ani.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not saying it's a good idea, but a lot of the complexity surrounding automated driving is actually because you are confined to a 2D space and have to follow roads/road signs. When you can just lift off and adjust verticality to avoid objects all you really need is a way to detect and avoid obstacles and some navigation logic. Landing is probably the most difficult part to automate.

Not super easy but it is actually easier than self-driving cars (which is why almost all of a commercial flight is running on autopilot)

[โ€“] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When you can just lift off and adjust verticality to avoid objects

You need to navigate between objects on an additional access. Also, manage speed and trajectory with a changing mass, as you exhaust fuel.

Not rocket science, but its close.

it is actually easier than self-driving cars (which is why almost all of a commercial flight is running on autopilot)

Commercial flight follows lanes of traffic with regular well-regulated flight paths.

One thing that gets helicopters and small engine aircraft pilots in trouble is that they don't have any of that.