Technology

59569 readers

3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

649

Generative AI is reportedly tripling carbon dioxide emissions from data centers (www.techradar.com)

submitted 2 months ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/20289663

A report from Morgan Stanley suggests the datacenter industry is on track to emit 2.5 billion tons by 2030, which is three times higher than the predictions if generative AI had not come into play.

The extra demand from GenAI will reportedly lead to a rise in emissions from 200 million tons this year to 600 million tons by 2030, thanks largely to the construction of more data centers to keep up with the demand for cloud services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If I run some AI model on my GPU and power my computer via solar power and some batteries, am I actually contributing significantly to GHG emissions?

Like what is the embodied energy of an AI model?

As usual, pundits and scientists confuse what is and what could be with the truth. For example plastic recycling isn't possible because "right now economics don't make it profitable". Meaning capitalism is killing us, not plastics. I suspect the same is true for AI.

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The model has to be trained, refined, etc. You running it off grid isn't the entire process, but I agree with you in a different sense.

If not AI, then there would be some other kind of compute taking up server capacity. It's on the data centers to solve this one, not AI.

[–] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yea but the models are already trained and noone pays to use the open source ones, so you're not really contributing to the training greenhouse gas emissions if you use an open source gen ai model locally.

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Training a model isn't free. It takes money and compute. That's also the greenhouse emissions. Even if you don't pay for any model and run it locally using solar, you've still got to consider what came before.