this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
1343 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 121 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They should be required to change their name

[–] dan@upvote.au 109 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's amusing. Meta's AI team is more open than "Open"AI ever was - they publish so many research papers for free, and the latest versions of Llama are very capable models that you can run on your own hardware (if it's powerful enough) for free as long as you don't use it in an app with more than 700 million monthly users.

[–] merari42@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's the famous "As long as your not Google, Amazon or Apple" licence.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

which seems like a decent license idea to me

[–] Damage@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everything should be licensed like that

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Needs Microsoft added to the list.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's because Facebook is selling your data and access to advertise to you. The better AI gets across the board, the more money they make. AI isn't the product, you are.

OpenAI makes money off selling AI to others. AI is the product, not you.

The fact facebook release more code, in this instance, isn't a good thing. It's a reminder how fucked we all are because they make so much off our personal data they can afford to give away literally BILLIONS of dollars in IP.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Facebook doesn't sell your data, nor does Google. That's a common misconception. They sell your attention. Advertisers can show ads to people based on some targeting criteria, but they never see any user data.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They may also sell the data.

I bet the NSA backdoor isn't free.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Selling your data would be stupid, because they make money with the fact that they have data about you nobody else has. Selling it would completely break their business model.

Depends why they are selling it, to whom, and under what restrictions.

Yes, they don't make the majority of their money from selling actual data, but that doesn't mean they don't do it.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] lando55@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please take no offense in this, I will probably not use your name suggestions, SatansMaggotyCumFart

I’m deeply offended.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean killer robots from the future could solve many problems. I can elaborate, but you're going to have to think 4th dimensionally.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 1 month ago

Could solve a lot of problems for the rich, that’s for sure.